It doesn’t seem like a whole lot has changed from the first two reviews. Overall, I agree with the concept, even though it may be hard to receive (constructive) criticism. I know that I have a hard time taking the thoughts from my head and putting them on paper and have them sound coherent. They make much better sense in my head. Getting the feedback from my classmates helped a lot. By this third review, it was much easier to give suggestions. Although, I think – and it seems that most of my classmates agree – that the star system really worked the best. I don’t think it really had to do with the stars, it’s just that along with the stars, we had specific areas to look at. Unfortunately, since the first review, the amount or lack of participation of some members hasn’t changed. The responsibility of making this peer review work is dependent upon the degree to which the peers participate. **new edited version** I found that it is important to check my spam mail, notifications for comments on my style guide arrived there. I didn’t notice until today. My sincere apologies for thinking/stating that my group mates hadn’t critiqued my guide.
- If you can read this, thank a teacher
-
Recent Writings
